Skip to main content

The Impact of Needs on Media Messages

The 15 Basic Appeals outlines by Jim Fowles are constantly recurring and form the foundation for all major advertisements. They are key to get a message across to consumers and influence them to buy a certain product. With the proper knowledge, these needs can be easily identified, but to most people, it just seems like the advertisement is exactly what they need, be it food or sunscreen. By using subtle messages, products are more easily sold, convincing people that something they buy will make them safer, have more friends, or more independent, even if this is in no way true. Through these, companies are able to establish a name for themselves, and better appeal to their audiences, a useful tactic that has significantly boosted sales.
One of the most popular appeals is the need for affiliation. It implies that buying a certain product will help you gain friendship or a sense of belonging, while not getting a certain product will cause everyone you love to abandon you. Seems a bit harsh, but consumers fall for it every day. For example, look at the Share a Coke campaign. Drinking a soda is no longer about personal enjoyment, but about forming bonds with other people. With a Coke can that has someone’s name on it, you can make new friends, strengthen old bonds, and bring a community together, right? Well when I put it like that, maybe not, but when this ad is repeated over and over again, people want something to belong to. Who wants to be the weirdo who isn’t sharing a drink with someone- and you know, loses all their friends because of it. This sort of extreme is definitely not put into the ad itself but is very heavily implied- showing how powerful advertisements are. If they clearly established that: drink means friend and no drink equal no friend (insert caveman grunting) then people would be less likely to fall for the product. But a seemingly casual relationship between the two? Two people just happening to share a Coke together or getting one for someone close to you- that is money making at its finest.
The differences between the needs are often very nUaNcEd and companies have to be careful to recognize the distinction, or they risk advertising a product in a way that does not appeal to the target audience. For example, if you are trying to sell something that is not very popular, like a Samsung, appealing to the need for affiliation is not usually successful, and something like the need to satisfy curiosity (think big numbers and science) is more advantageous. More traditionally popular companies like Apple, on the other hand, can use the need for affiliation successfully, selling not only a phone but a community.

Image result for coke share a coke campaign

Comments

  1. Hi, it's really Ashley Jun because her blog comments don't work. "The formatting of your article was easily followed with giving an overview of how advertising is meant to appeal to certain needs of the consumer, but I also liked how you specified on the need for affiliation with the Share a Coke ads. Honing in on explaining this commonly known product provides perspective on how the intention of the advertisers gets overlooked. Besides the argument of the article, I really enjoyed your style of writing because it reflects your personality of balancing humor (insert caveman grunting) and seriousness when explaining how audiences are targeted."

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

am I cool yet?

Merchants of Cool. If I am going to be entirely honest, even the title makes me cringe a bit. It seems torn between two generations, or like one generation desperately trying to fit into the mold of another. This title is the epitome of “I’m not like other moms, I’m a cool mom” which is not something anyone should be striving for. This desperation to “be one of the teens” be it to genuinely understand them or turn them into a conquerable market makes me rethink the way I consume and the sort of advertising I fall for. Yes, I can laugh at the kids in the movie for being so blindly dependent on the idea of autonomy that they don’t see the way they are being manipulated, but more often than not- I am that kid in the movie. As such a large market, teens have the power to make a major impact on a company’s sales. In theory, consumers should be in charge of the market-but companies have made sure to stay one step ahead so that teen life and the market are one and the same. One of...

Watch Your Language !!1!11!1!11!!

Often times, people fail to realize how much of an impact that the language they use can have on other people. In an age of social media, this problem has only worsened. People feel safe behind a screen, be it a phone or computer, and have no issue using offensive slurs/ insensitive phrases because they will never have to deal with the consequences of their action. Very few people I know would have the nerve to come say n*gger to my face, yet I see many that I know feeling very comfortable using it online where they think their actions don’t count. This environment is only cultivated by social media, with people flippantly throwing around words like retarded, f*g, and d*ke, without thinking about the impact their phrases have on others. Yes, I am sure that people who say these words “don’t mean it” and have no malicious intent, but people need to realize that the words they say and put out into the world have real power. Not only is it a reflection of themselves and the way they ch...

News Story From Two Perspectives

News Story from Two Perspectives The issue of the travel ban was very controversial, and displayed differently from various news agencies. Its core facts are not highly disputed, but the implications of them, however, are highly contested. At a legislative level, it blocks out immigrants from eight countries ( Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Chad, North Korea, and some people from Venezuela), and denies them access to the country. The debate comes in here: is this truly for national safety, or just anti-Muslim sentiments being passed off as concern for the country. An article from the Washington Post and another from the New York Times take opposing stances on this, and through their language we can see the argument the authors are trying to make, even if it is not explicitly stated. The article from the Washington Post, titled “ The travel ban is still a weapon in Trump’s anti-immigrant arsena l” clearly establishes the thesis, and continues to utilize language that places a...