Skip to main content

News Story From Two Perspectives

News Story from Two Perspectives
The issue of the travel ban was very controversial, and displayed differently from various news agencies. Its core facts are not highly disputed, but the implications of them, however, are highly contested. At a legislative level, it blocks out immigrants from eight countries (Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Chad, North Korea, and some people from Venezuela), and denies them access to the country. The debate comes in here: is this truly for national safety, or just anti-Muslim sentiments being passed off as concern for the country. An article from the Washington Post and another from the New York Times take opposing stances on this, and through their language we can see the argument the authors are trying to make, even if it is not explicitly stated.

The article from the Washington Post, titled “The travel ban is still a weapon in Trump’s anti-immigrant arsenal” clearly establishes the thesis, and continues to utilize language that places all of the blame on Trump and highlights the cruelty and inhumanity of the ban, especially when it is used due to what the author calls “toxic bigotry.” Through this alone, we can see that any claims of national security are automatically disregarded, and the true issue (at least as the author sees it) is presented. Words such as “punishingly narrow, vague and arbitrary” are used to highlight the flaws in the travel ban policy, with such random standards meaning that national security is not the true issue at hand, but rather racism being disguised as something else entirely. They continue to use words such as “desperate” and “merciless” as well as a continued emphasis on “children” to show the humanity of the immigrants that Trump is so quick to label terrorists and block out of the country.

On the other hand, the New York Times article, titled “Supreme Court Allows Trump Travel Ban to Take Effect” attempts to take a more neutral standpoint, but uses biased language that shows they are more lenient to the idea of the travel ban, and less willing to blame it on Trump and xenophobia. With the word “allows” in the title, from the get go, a lot of the heat is being taken away from Trump and being redirected at the Supreme Court, showing that others agreed with him and that this policy was not just an abuse of executive power. Even when referring to blocking people out of the country, rather than using words with negative connotations like barred, refused entry, or banned, the author refers to people affected by the travel ban as “unable to emigrate,” making it seem like a personal choice, rather than assigning blame to Trump. They continue on to say that immigrants are no longer able to “work, study, or travel” in the U.S. as opposed to the article which emphasized family separation and things regarding quality of life and connections with others, rather than things like working and studying which seem more menial.





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Politics in the English Language (Trump)

Ah. Politics. Everyone in America's favorite discussion topic. Unfortunately, more often than not, conversations about politics are less about expressing educated opinions, but about who can warp words the best into creating a message than people want to hear. Hence, our current president. Any personal opinions about him aside, which I promise will make a couple appearances here, his use of language has had a major impact on his presidential career, and is debatably the main reason he won the presidential election. While Trump may come across as uneducated and random in his word choice, that is far from true. He is “careful” with the words he uses, and while it may not have a positive effect on many liberals, that is not always his intention. Trump uses his language to set him apart from other presidents of the past, and rather than using large words and perfect grammar, speaks more like an average American would. This means randomly changing subjects during a sentence, not having...
1 comment
Read more

Politics in the English Language (Orwell)

1. I agree with Orwell's position. While basic language may be an instrument of growth, we use language for more than mere communication He goes into detail about how politicians twist their words and intentionally create vagueness to confuse and appease the masses- something that had been a successful political tactic. When used properly, language is for communication, but when used more manipulatively, it can become a weapon, with fallacies illustrating the way we use language to a achieve a negative goal. Even as I right this, I am torn between sounding super professional and using a bunch of fillers words so I can make this blogpost reach half a page. 2.Orwell objects to ready made phrases and mixed metaphors because they are overdone and no longer cause an image to form in a reader's mind, they are often misused, and when they are utilized, it is because writes have become lazy and are trying to avoid investing time and effort into creating their own unique phrases. ...
2 comments
Read more

am I cool yet?

Merchants of Cool. If I am going to be entirely honest, even the title makes me cringe a bit. It seems torn between two generations, or like one generation desperately trying to fit into the mold of another. This title is the epitome of “I’m not like other moms, I’m a cool mom” which is not something anyone should be striving for. This desperation to “be one of the teens” be it to genuinely understand them or turn them into a conquerable market makes me rethink the way I consume and the sort of advertising I fall for. Yes, I can laugh at the kids in the movie for being so blindly dependent on the idea of autonomy that they don’t see the way they are being manipulated, but more often than not- I am that kid in the movie. As such a large market, teens have the power to make a major impact on a company’s sales. In theory, consumers should be in charge of the market-but companies have made sure to stay one step ahead so that teen life and the market are one and the same. One of...
Post a Comment
Read more