Skip to main content

News Story From Two Perspectives

News Story from Two Perspectives
The issue of the travel ban was very controversial, and displayed differently from various news agencies. Its core facts are not highly disputed, but the implications of them, however, are highly contested. At a legislative level, it blocks out immigrants from eight countries (Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Chad, North Korea, and some people from Venezuela), and denies them access to the country. The debate comes in here: is this truly for national safety, or just anti-Muslim sentiments being passed off as concern for the country. An article from the Washington Post and another from the New York Times take opposing stances on this, and through their language we can see the argument the authors are trying to make, even if it is not explicitly stated.

The article from the Washington Post, titled “The travel ban is still a weapon in Trump’s anti-immigrant arsenal” clearly establishes the thesis, and continues to utilize language that places all of the blame on Trump and highlights the cruelty and inhumanity of the ban, especially when it is used due to what the author calls “toxic bigotry.” Through this alone, we can see that any claims of national security are automatically disregarded, and the true issue (at least as the author sees it) is presented. Words such as “punishingly narrow, vague and arbitrary” are used to highlight the flaws in the travel ban policy, with such random standards meaning that national security is not the true issue at hand, but rather racism being disguised as something else entirely. They continue to use words such as “desperate” and “merciless” as well as a continued emphasis on “children” to show the humanity of the immigrants that Trump is so quick to label terrorists and block out of the country.

On the other hand, the New York Times article, titled “Supreme Court Allows Trump Travel Ban to Take Effect” attempts to take a more neutral standpoint, but uses biased language that shows they are more lenient to the idea of the travel ban, and less willing to blame it on Trump and xenophobia. With the word “allows” in the title, from the get go, a lot of the heat is being taken away from Trump and being redirected at the Supreme Court, showing that others agreed with him and that this policy was not just an abuse of executive power. Even when referring to blocking people out of the country, rather than using words with negative connotations like barred, refused entry, or banned, the author refers to people affected by the travel ban as “unable to emigrate,” making it seem like a personal choice, rather than assigning blame to Trump. They continue on to say that immigrants are no longer able to “work, study, or travel” in the U.S. as opposed to the article which emphasized family separation and things regarding quality of life and connections with others, rather than things like working and studying which seem more menial.





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reflection

Reflection Critical thinking, the media blogs specifically, were a great way for me to improve my analysis skills and give me a better understanding of the way that media is used to manipulate me. Looking back at my first media blog, I discussed how happy I was that media is becoming more inclusive. I was excited about people of all colors, genders, sexual orientations, and body types were being included in the media we consume, but after the class I realized the true reasons these people are a part of advertisements. It is all for monetary gain. Companies do not care about inclusion, they only care about ways to make money and appeal to a broader audience in order to do so. The same companies that sold one body and one skin type, have somehow managed to sell me my own identity, commodifying people or color and other minorities as a way to get more money. Once we isolate the true drive of all advertisements and all companies, it is much easier to see through them and not as easil...
Post a Comment
Read more

Politics in the English Language (Orwell)

1. I agree with Orwell's position. While basic language may be an instrument of growth, we use language for more than mere communication He goes into detail about how politicians twist their words and intentionally create vagueness to confuse and appease the masses- something that had been a successful political tactic. When used properly, language is for communication, but when used more manipulatively, it can become a weapon, with fallacies illustrating the way we use language to a achieve a negative goal. Even as I right this, I am torn between sounding super professional and using a bunch of fillers words so I can make this blogpost reach half a page. 2.Orwell objects to ready made phrases and mixed metaphors because they are overdone and no longer cause an image to form in a reader's mind, they are often misused, and when they are utilized, it is because writes have become lazy and are trying to avoid investing time and effort into creating their own unique phrases. ...
2 comments
Read more

the midriff ;)

Women in media have always been oversexualized. With sex icons changing from Marilyn Monroe, to Britney Spears and Miley Cyrus, the role of women in media, and the way for women to reach high position in media is by being sexy and powerful, an idea that media has captured and sold to consumers in a neat package: the midriff. The midriff is more than a bared stomach, more than just an exposed sliver of skin, but is the embodiment of the ideal woman. A woman who is obsessed with her appearance, and uses her sexuality in order to gain power/ control others. She is not real, rather appeals to what women want to be. Or at least, what media wants them to think they want to be. Of course some of these traits exist in women: yes some women are obsessed with appearances, and some are obsessed with the approval of men, but is this due to media, or because that is the way things just are? Or more concisely, is media a mirror or a feedback loop? The answer to this is blurred because of the way med...
Post a Comment
Read more