Skip to main content

News Story From Two Perspectives

News Story from Two Perspectives
The issue of the travel ban was very controversial, and displayed differently from various news agencies. Its core facts are not highly disputed, but the implications of them, however, are highly contested. At a legislative level, it blocks out immigrants from eight countries (Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Chad, North Korea, and some people from Venezuela), and denies them access to the country. The debate comes in here: is this truly for national safety, or just anti-Muslim sentiments being passed off as concern for the country. An article from the Washington Post and another from the New York Times take opposing stances on this, and through their language we can see the argument the authors are trying to make, even if it is not explicitly stated.

The article from the Washington Post, titled “The travel ban is still a weapon in Trump’s anti-immigrant arsenal” clearly establishes the thesis, and continues to utilize language that places all of the blame on Trump and highlights the cruelty and inhumanity of the ban, especially when it is used due to what the author calls “toxic bigotry.” Through this alone, we can see that any claims of national security are automatically disregarded, and the true issue (at least as the author sees it) is presented. Words such as “punishingly narrow, vague and arbitrary” are used to highlight the flaws in the travel ban policy, with such random standards meaning that national security is not the true issue at hand, but rather racism being disguised as something else entirely. They continue to use words such as “desperate” and “merciless” as well as a continued emphasis on “children” to show the humanity of the immigrants that Trump is so quick to label terrorists and block out of the country.

On the other hand, the New York Times article, titled “Supreme Court Allows Trump Travel Ban to Take Effect” attempts to take a more neutral standpoint, but uses biased language that shows they are more lenient to the idea of the travel ban, and less willing to blame it on Trump and xenophobia. With the word “allows” in the title, from the get go, a lot of the heat is being taken away from Trump and being redirected at the Supreme Court, showing that others agreed with him and that this policy was not just an abuse of executive power. Even when referring to blocking people out of the country, rather than using words with negative connotations like barred, refused entry, or banned, the author refers to people affected by the travel ban as “unable to emigrate,” making it seem like a personal choice, rather than assigning blame to Trump. They continue on to say that immigrants are no longer able to “work, study, or travel” in the U.S. as opposed to the article which emphasized family separation and things regarding quality of life and connections with others, rather than things like working and studying which seem more menial.





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Politics in the English Language (Orwell)

1. I agree with Orwell's position. While basic language may be an instrument of growth, we use language for more than mere communication He goes into detail about how politicians twist their words and intentionally create vagueness to confuse and appease the masses- something that had been a successful political tactic. When used properly, language is for communication, but when used more manipulatively, it can become a weapon, with fallacies illustrating the way we use language to a achieve a negative goal. Even as I right this, I am torn between sounding super professional and using a bunch of fillers words so I can make this blogpost reach half a page. 2.Orwell objects to ready made phrases and mixed metaphors because they are overdone and no longer cause an image to form in a reader's mind, they are often misused, and when they are utilized, it is because writes have become lazy and are trying to avoid investing time and effort into creating their own unique phrases. ...
2 comments
Read more

feminism in media

What does it mean to be a feminist? By definition, feminism means “ the theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes.” So anyone who believes that men and women should be equal meets this definition. Unfortunately, this definition of a feminist has been warped by the media to mean something else entirely. Now a feminist is seen as someone who hates men, believes that women should be in power, and doesn’t shave their legs (what men usually believe) or must always be going to protests, advocating for equal rights, stopping every person that makes a joke, and owning their body 100%, someone who never does things for a man (what women usually believe). The problem is, nothing good comes out of these definitions. The only result is people feeling left out of “being a feminist” or do not want to identify with that term because it stands for something that many think of as bad. Media has been the main factor in spreading these two definitions. Look at things like the ...
1 comment
Read more

no one reads anymore and i am distraught

What happened to reading? What happened to getting into bed late at night with a book and not wanting to sleep because you are in the middle of a good chapter but every chapter is a good chapter so once you finish the good chapter you still aren’t ready to sleep because there are so many more and your parents come into your room and it’s 11 but you are in third grade and your bedtime is 8:30 so you wait for them to sleep then you pull out the super cool pen you have that has a flashlight at the end of it then you read until you fall asleep with the book in your lap and when you wake up in the morning the light is still on and you have lost your page so you quickly search for it as you rub the sleep out of your eyes and hurry up to get dressed so you can read on the couch? Just me? Oddly specific anecdote aside, it has been so long since I have been able to get together with someone and talk about a book in depth. Not a school book, but a book we have both read in our spare time...
1 comment
Read more