Skip to main content

am I cool yet?

Merchants of Cool. If I am going to be entirely honest, even the title makes me cringe a bit. It seems torn between two generations, or like one generation desperately trying to fit into the mold of another. This title is the epitome of “I’m not like other moms, I’m a cool mom” which is not something anyone should be striving for. This desperation to “be one of the teens” be it to genuinely understand them or turn them into a conquerable market makes me rethink the way I consume and the sort of advertising I fall for. Yes, I can laugh at the kids in the movie for being so blindly dependent on the idea of autonomy that they don’t see the way they are being manipulated, but more often than not- I am that kid in the movie.
As such a large market, teens have the power to make a major impact on a company’s sales. In theory, consumers should be in charge of the market-but companies have made sure to stay one step ahead so that teen life and the market are one and the same. One of the ideas that stood out to me the most was the idea of finding trendsetters. Companies roam the streets, find people that have their own sense of self and have created their own style, then turn that unique style into something mainstream. First of all, I am pretty sure you can’t take pictures of minors without an adult’s consent (thank you Nixie), but more importantly- companies take what is “cool” and make it not cool. Let’s look at e-boys. It’s common enough that I don’t have to bother looking up a definition, we all know what an e-boy is. But just in case, I’m talking painted nails, earrings, an actual sense of style- usually darker clothing, long hair, and lots and lots of rings, maybe even little stars painted under the eyes. These are not things that were common a couple years ago, quite the opposite. Boys who painted their nails, wore earrings and rings, cared about their clothing were often labeled gay or weird, but now things have totally changed; now everyone finds them attractive. The market for things like mom jeans and traditionally feminine accessories has increased, not just because men are becoming more in touch with their femininity, but because companies are fueling this need to fit in. By establishing an entirely different style, people feel like they have to go out and revamp their entire closets, which they often do. A cycle that repeats itself frequently as styles are always changing; coincidence? I think not.
Image result for e boys and e girls

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Politics in the English Language (Orwell)

1. I agree with Orwell's position. While basic language may be an instrument of growth, we use language for more than mere communication He goes into detail about how politicians twist their words and intentionally create vagueness to confuse and appease the masses- something that had been a successful political tactic. When used properly, language is for communication, but when used more manipulatively, it can become a weapon, with fallacies illustrating the way we use language to a achieve a negative goal. Even as I right this, I am torn between sounding super professional and using a bunch of fillers words so I can make this blogpost reach half a page. 2.Orwell objects to ready made phrases and mixed metaphors because they are overdone and no longer cause an image to form in a reader's mind, they are often misused, and when they are utilized, it is because writes have become lazy and are trying to avoid investing time and effort into creating their own unique phrases. ...

Reflection

Reflection Critical thinking, the media blogs specifically, were a great way for me to improve my analysis skills and give me a better understanding of the way that media is used to manipulate me. Looking back at my first media blog, I discussed how happy I was that media is becoming more inclusive. I was excited about people of all colors, genders, sexual orientations, and body types were being included in the media we consume, but after the class I realized the true reasons these people are a part of advertisements. It is all for monetary gain. Companies do not care about inclusion, they only care about ways to make money and appeal to a broader audience in order to do so. The same companies that sold one body and one skin type, have somehow managed to sell me my own identity, commodifying people or color and other minorities as a way to get more money. Once we isolate the true drive of all advertisements and all companies, it is much easier to see through them and not as easil...

News Story From Two Perspectives

News Story from Two Perspectives The issue of the travel ban was very controversial, and displayed differently from various news agencies. Its core facts are not highly disputed, but the implications of them, however, are highly contested. At a legislative level, it blocks out immigrants from eight countries ( Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Chad, North Korea, and some people from Venezuela), and denies them access to the country. The debate comes in here: is this truly for national safety, or just anti-Muslim sentiments being passed off as concern for the country. An article from the Washington Post and another from the New York Times take opposing stances on this, and through their language we can see the argument the authors are trying to make, even if it is not explicitly stated. The article from the Washington Post, titled “ The travel ban is still a weapon in Trump’s anti-immigrant arsena l” clearly establishes the thesis, and continues to utilize language that places a...