Skip to main content

The Impact of Needs on Media Messages

The 15 Basic Appeals outlines by Jim Fowles are constantly recurring and form the foundation for all major advertisements. They are key to get a message across to consumers and influence them to buy a certain product. With the proper knowledge, these needs can be easily identified, but to most people, it just seems like the advertisement is exactly what they need, be it food or sunscreen. By using subtle messages, products are more easily sold, convincing people that something they buy will make them safer, have more friends, or more independent, even if this is in no way true. Through these, companies are able to establish a name for themselves, and better appeal to their audiences, a useful tactic that has significantly boosted sales.
One of the most popular appeals is the need for affiliation. It implies that buying a certain product will help you gain friendship or a sense of belonging, while not getting a certain product will cause everyone you love to abandon you. Seems a bit harsh, but consumers fall for it every day. For example, look at the Share a Coke campaign. Drinking a soda is no longer about personal enjoyment, but about forming bonds with other people. With a Coke can that has someone’s name on it, you can make new friends, strengthen old bonds, and bring a community together, right? Well when I put it like that, maybe not, but when this ad is repeated over and over again, people want something to belong to. Who wants to be the weirdo who isn’t sharing a drink with someone- and you know, loses all their friends because of it. This sort of extreme is definitely not put into the ad itself but is very heavily implied- showing how powerful advertisements are. If they clearly established that: drink means friend and no drink equal no friend (insert caveman grunting) then people would be less likely to fall for the product. But a seemingly casual relationship between the two? Two people just happening to share a Coke together or getting one for someone close to you- that is money making at its finest.
The differences between the needs are often very nUaNcEd and companies have to be careful to recognize the distinction, or they risk advertising a product in a way that does not appeal to the target audience. For example, if you are trying to sell something that is not very popular, like a Samsung, appealing to the need for affiliation is not usually successful, and something like the need to satisfy curiosity (think big numbers and science) is more advantageous. More traditionally popular companies like Apple, on the other hand, can use the need for affiliation successfully, selling not only a phone but a community.

Image result for coke share a coke campaign

Comments

  1. Hi, it's really Ashley Jun because her blog comments don't work. "The formatting of your article was easily followed with giving an overview of how advertising is meant to appeal to certain needs of the consumer, but I also liked how you specified on the need for affiliation with the Share a Coke ads. Honing in on explaining this commonly known product provides perspective on how the intention of the advertisers gets overlooked. Besides the argument of the article, I really enjoyed your style of writing because it reflects your personality of balancing humor (insert caveman grunting) and seriousness when explaining how audiences are targeted."

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Politics in the English Language (Orwell)

1. I agree with Orwell's position. While basic language may be an instrument of growth, we use language for more than mere communication He goes into detail about how politicians twist their words and intentionally create vagueness to confuse and appease the masses- something that had been a successful political tactic. When used properly, language is for communication, but when used more manipulatively, it can become a weapon, with fallacies illustrating the way we use language to a achieve a negative goal. Even as I right this, I am torn between sounding super professional and using a bunch of fillers words so I can make this blogpost reach half a page. 2.Orwell objects to ready made phrases and mixed metaphors because they are overdone and no longer cause an image to form in a reader's mind, they are often misused, and when they are utilized, it is because writes have become lazy and are trying to avoid investing time and effort into creating their own unique phrases. ...

Politics in the English Language (Trump)

Ah. Politics. Everyone in America's favorite discussion topic. Unfortunately, more often than not, conversations about politics are less about expressing educated opinions, but about who can warp words the best into creating a message than people want to hear. Hence, our current president. Any personal opinions about him aside, which I promise will make a couple appearances here, his use of language has had a major impact on his presidential career, and is debatably the main reason he won the presidential election. While Trump may come across as uneducated and random in his word choice, that is far from true. He is “careful” with the words he uses, and while it may not have a positive effect on many liberals, that is not always his intention. Trump uses his language to set him apart from other presidents of the past, and rather than using large words and perfect grammar, speaks more like an average American would. This means randomly changing subjects during a sentence, not having...

sPOilErS

I think we can all come to the general consensus that spoilers suck, and in my opinion should be sent to their own special section of hell. Tell me, please, what sort of sick satisfaction do you get from ruining the ending of something- you absolute sadists. Honestly, I don’t think movie spoilers are that bad, you would have found out in two hours anyway- but someone who spoils the SEASON FINALE of something. J a i l. Maximum security for your crimes against humanity. The worst part is, the occurrences of spoilers have greatly increased with the spread of social media. How quickly informations spreads has drastically changed spoiler culture, and I, for one, am not here for it. In the past, spoilers were not such a big problem for two reasons. First, people couldn’t just record shows to watch them later, either you saw it or you didn’t, and if you didn’t see it, you relied on trailers in order to gain knowledge of what you missed. Secondly, the more access to social media hav...