Skip to main content

the midriff ;)

Women in media have always been oversexualized. With sex icons changing from Marilyn Monroe, to Britney Spears and Miley Cyrus, the role of women in media, and the way for women to reach high position in media is by being sexy and powerful, an idea that media has captured and sold to consumers in a neat package: the midriff. The midriff is more than a bared stomach, more than just an exposed sliver of skin, but is the embodiment of the ideal woman. A woman who is obsessed with her appearance, and uses her sexuality in order to gain power/ control others. She is not real, rather appeals to what women want to be. Or at least, what media wants them to think they want to be. Of course some of these traits exist in women: yes some women are obsessed with appearances, and some are obsessed with the approval of men, but is this due to media, or because that is the way things just are? Or more concisely, is media a mirror or a feedback loop? The answer to this is blurred because of the way media is constantly changing, seemingly to fit who we are- but that is far from true. Media is not a reflection of who we are, but is constantly changing to create a new model of what we want to be. If media was just a mirror, there would be no market- people would be content with what they were and what they had, and would not strive to buy new products or become someone different. Through archetypes like the midriff, media sells a new definition of what it means to be beautiful, causing many to sacrifice their health and their money in order to achieve that goal. If all people see in media are white or beautifully exotic girls with tan skin, lean stomachs, with something always exposed- then that becomes the accepted standards. It becomes what girls wish they were and what guys expect to be the reality. This is why media is so dangerous. As time goes on, it strays further and further away from being a feedback loop, and becomes our reality. It has gotten to a point where everything we consume is some form of advertising, some form of telling people that what we are itself is not good enough, and that we must constantly change to fit the new definition of perfect. A definition controlled by none other than the media.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.2202/1940-1639.1341

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Politics in the English Language (Orwell)

1. I agree with Orwell's position. While basic language may be an instrument of growth, we use language for more than mere communication He goes into detail about how politicians twist their words and intentionally create vagueness to confuse and appease the masses- something that had been a successful political tactic. When used properly, language is for communication, but when used more manipulatively, it can become a weapon, with fallacies illustrating the way we use language to a achieve a negative goal. Even as I right this, I am torn between sounding super professional and using a bunch of fillers words so I can make this blogpost reach half a page. 2.Orwell objects to ready made phrases and mixed metaphors because they are overdone and no longer cause an image to form in a reader's mind, they are often misused, and when they are utilized, it is because writes have become lazy and are trying to avoid investing time and effort into creating their own unique phrases.

feminism in media

What does it mean to be a feminist? By definition, feminism means “ the theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes.” So anyone who believes that men and women should be equal meets this definition. Unfortunately, this definition of a feminist has been warped by the media to mean something else entirely. Now a feminist is seen as someone who hates men, believes that women should be in power, and doesn’t shave their legs (what men usually believe) or must always be going to protests, advocating for equal rights, stopping every person that makes a joke, and owning their body 100%, someone who never does things for a man (what women usually believe). The problem is, nothing good comes out of these definitions. The only result is people feeling left out of “being a feminist” or do not want to identify with that term because it stands for something that many think of as bad. Media has been the main factor in spreading these two definitions. Look at things like the

no one reads anymore and i am distraught

What happened to reading? What happened to getting into bed late at night with a book and not wanting to sleep because you are in the middle of a good chapter but every chapter is a good chapter so once you finish the good chapter you still aren’t ready to sleep because there are so many more and your parents come into your room and it’s 11 but you are in third grade and your bedtime is 8:30 so you wait for them to sleep then you pull out the super cool pen you have that has a flashlight at the end of it then you read until you fall asleep with the book in your lap and when you wake up in the morning the light is still on and you have lost your page so you quickly search for it as you rub the sleep out of your eyes and hurry up to get dressed so you can read on the couch? Just me? Oddly specific anecdote aside, it has been so long since I have been able to get together with someone and talk about a book in depth. Not a school book, but a book we have both read in our spare time