Skip to main content

the midriff ;)

Women in media have always been oversexualized. With sex icons changing from Marilyn Monroe, to Britney Spears and Miley Cyrus, the role of women in media, and the way for women to reach high position in media is by being sexy and powerful, an idea that media has captured and sold to consumers in a neat package: the midriff. The midriff is more than a bared stomach, more than just an exposed sliver of skin, but is the embodiment of the ideal woman. A woman who is obsessed with her appearance, and uses her sexuality in order to gain power/ control others. She is not real, rather appeals to what women want to be. Or at least, what media wants them to think they want to be. Of course some of these traits exist in women: yes some women are obsessed with appearances, and some are obsessed with the approval of men, but is this due to media, or because that is the way things just are? Or more concisely, is media a mirror or a feedback loop? The answer to this is blurred because of the way media is constantly changing, seemingly to fit who we are- but that is far from true. Media is not a reflection of who we are, but is constantly changing to create a new model of what we want to be. If media was just a mirror, there would be no market- people would be content with what they were and what they had, and would not strive to buy new products or become someone different. Through archetypes like the midriff, media sells a new definition of what it means to be beautiful, causing many to sacrifice their health and their money in order to achieve that goal. If all people see in media are white or beautifully exotic girls with tan skin, lean stomachs, with something always exposed- then that becomes the accepted standards. It becomes what girls wish they were and what guys expect to be the reality. This is why media is so dangerous. As time goes on, it strays further and further away from being a feedback loop, and becomes our reality. It has gotten to a point where everything we consume is some form of advertising, some form of telling people that what we are itself is not good enough, and that we must constantly change to fit the new definition of perfect. A definition controlled by none other than the media.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.2202/1940-1639.1341

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Politics in the English Language (Orwell)

1. I agree with Orwell's position. While basic language may be an instrument of growth, we use language for more than mere communication He goes into detail about how politicians twist their words and intentionally create vagueness to confuse and appease the masses- something that had been a successful political tactic. When used properly, language is for communication, but when used more manipulatively, it can become a weapon, with fallacies illustrating the way we use language to a achieve a negative goal. Even as I right this, I am torn between sounding super professional and using a bunch of fillers words so I can make this blogpost reach half a page. 2.Orwell objects to ready made phrases and mixed metaphors because they are overdone and no longer cause an image to form in a reader's mind, they are often misused, and when they are utilized, it is because writes have become lazy and are trying to avoid investing time and effort into creating their own unique phrases. ...
2 comments
Read more

Politics in the English Language (Trump)

Ah. Politics. Everyone in America's favorite discussion topic. Unfortunately, more often than not, conversations about politics are less about expressing educated opinions, but about who can warp words the best into creating a message than people want to hear. Hence, our current president. Any personal opinions about him aside, which I promise will make a couple appearances here, his use of language has had a major impact on his presidential career, and is debatably the main reason he won the presidential election. While Trump may come across as uneducated and random in his word choice, that is far from true. He is “careful” with the words he uses, and while it may not have a positive effect on many liberals, that is not always his intention. Trump uses his language to set him apart from other presidents of the past, and rather than using large words and perfect grammar, speaks more like an average American would. This means randomly changing subjects during a sentence, not having...
1 comment
Read more

sPOilErS

I think we can all come to the general consensus that spoilers suck, and in my opinion should be sent to their own special section of hell. Tell me, please, what sort of sick satisfaction do you get from ruining the ending of something- you absolute sadists. Honestly, I don’t think movie spoilers are that bad, you would have found out in two hours anyway- but someone who spoils the SEASON FINALE of something. J a i l. Maximum security for your crimes against humanity. The worst part is, the occurrences of spoilers have greatly increased with the spread of social media. How quickly informations spreads has drastically changed spoiler culture, and I, for one, am not here for it. In the past, spoilers were not such a big problem for two reasons. First, people couldn’t just record shows to watch them later, either you saw it or you didn’t, and if you didn’t see it, you relied on trailers in order to gain knowledge of what you missed. Secondly, the more access to social media hav...
1 comment
Read more