Skip to main content

Persuaders


In a film we watched in class, the issue of advertisement and the way that it infiltrates our world was analyzed. Often times, it gets to a point where ads are all that we see, and we are unable to see the way that our senses are manipulated in order to get us to buy a certain product. Various techniques are used to attract the attention of consumers. For example, companies work to create a persona for the product they are trying to sell, like Mr. Clean or the gecko from Geico, in order to create a level of relatability and draw in audiences. They also work to create a feeling of community or create emotional ties to a certain product, and convince consumers that if they buy something, they will be happy, or have friends, or stop being lonely. Obviously, the product does not have the intended effect, so people continually go back and buy new things, craving a sense of belonging they have been convinced they can find in material things. This creates a trap where companies sell an ideal that can never be attained, failing to tell their audience that obviously a surface cleaner is not going to awaken your deepest sexual fantasies (ie. Mr. Clean is an absolute stud). The messages created are solely for company gain, as can be expected. No one can say companies have our best interests at heart when they sell us a false version of reality in order to get us to buy a said product, and time and time again, it works. In my household, ads through television were never a problem. I have had Netflix for my entire life, and stopped having cable around age 6 so I don’t really remember a time where every time I sat down to relax, I was bombarded by advertisements. So every year, when the Super Bowl comes around, I am thrown for a loop, and, if I am totally honest, want to buy some things just to see if the commercial is true at all. Fortunately, my parents rule with an iron fist, so I have never gotten anything from a TV ad, but the fact that I even want it in the first place and risk my mother’s wrath by asking says a lot. Regardless, advertisements have a different effect on everyone, based on not only their environment, but also their values. For example, when I start going car-shopping, commercials with some car driving around in dirt and being reckless doesn’t really intrigue me, as recklessness and total freedom aren’t things I am super fond of. But put in an ad where there are kids in a car and “real life people, not actors” and you have got me hooked.

See the source image
See the source image

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reflection

Reflection Critical thinking, the media blogs specifically, were a great way for me to improve my analysis skills and give me a better understanding of the way that media is used to manipulate me. Looking back at my first media blog, I discussed how happy I was that media is becoming more inclusive. I was excited about people of all colors, genders, sexual orientations, and body types were being included in the media we consume, but after the class I realized the true reasons these people are a part of advertisements. It is all for monetary gain. Companies do not care about inclusion, they only care about ways to make money and appeal to a broader audience in order to do so. The same companies that sold one body and one skin type, have somehow managed to sell me my own identity, commodifying people or color and other minorities as a way to get more money. Once we isolate the true drive of all advertisements and all companies, it is much easier to see through them and not as easil...

the midriff ;)

Women in media have always been oversexualized. With sex icons changing from Marilyn Monroe, to Britney Spears and Miley Cyrus, the role of women in media, and the way for women to reach high position in media is by being sexy and powerful, an idea that media has captured and sold to consumers in a neat package: the midriff. The midriff is more than a bared stomach, more than just an exposed sliver of skin, but is the embodiment of the ideal woman. A woman who is obsessed with her appearance, and uses her sexuality in order to gain power/ control others. She is not real, rather appeals to what women want to be. Or at least, what media wants them to think they want to be. Of course some of these traits exist in women: yes some women are obsessed with appearances, and some are obsessed with the approval of men, but is this due to media, or because that is the way things just are? Or more concisely, is media a mirror or a feedback loop? The answer to this is blurred because of the way med...

Politics in the English Language (Orwell)

1. I agree with Orwell's position. While basic language may be an instrument of growth, we use language for more than mere communication He goes into detail about how politicians twist their words and intentionally create vagueness to confuse and appease the masses- something that had been a successful political tactic. When used properly, language is for communication, but when used more manipulatively, it can become a weapon, with fallacies illustrating the way we use language to a achieve a negative goal. Even as I right this, I am torn between sounding super professional and using a bunch of fillers words so I can make this blogpost reach half a page. 2.Orwell objects to ready made phrases and mixed metaphors because they are overdone and no longer cause an image to form in a reader's mind, they are often misused, and when they are utilized, it is because writes have become lazy and are trying to avoid investing time and effort into creating their own unique phrases. ...